在线人工智能评分标准生成器
立即建立自定义评估标准
Assessment Category | 1 Point | 2 Points | 3 Points | 4 Points | 5 Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thesis Statement | No clear thesis statement is present or it is unrelated to the topic. | Thesis statement is vague or only somewhat related to the topic. | Thesis statement is clear but lacks strength or specificity. | Thesis statement is clear and mostly specific to the topic. | Thesis statement is strong, clear, and directly addresses the prompt. |
Supporting Arguments | No supporting arguments are presented or are irrelevant. | One weak or unclear supporting argument is presented. | Two supporting arguments are presented but lack development. | Three supporting arguments are presented with some development. | Three or more well-developed and persuasive supporting arguments are presented. |
Evidence and Examples | No evidence or examples are provided to support arguments. | Evidence or examples are minimal or not clearly connected to arguments. | Some evidence or examples are provided but may be insufficient or somewhat unclear. | Adequate evidence and examples are provided and mostly support arguments. | Strong, relevant, and well-explained evidence and examples effectively support all arguments. |
Organization and Structure | Essay lacks clear organization; ideas are confusing or disjointed. | Some attempt at organization, but ideas are only loosely connected. | Organization is evident but may be inconsistent or somewhat unclear. | Essay is generally well organized with clear progression of ideas. | Essay is excellently organized with logical, clear, and smooth transitions. |
Grammar, Mechanics, and Style | Frequent grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors interfere with understanding. | Several errors are present and occasionally distract the reader. | Some errors are present but do not significantly hinder comprehension. | Few minor errors present; writing is generally clear and appropriate. | Writing is virtually free of errors; style is clear, persuasive, and appropriate for audience. |
创建自定义教育评分标准只需三个简单步骤
快速高效地使用我们的人工智能工具生成专业评估标准
定义您的评估标准
Step 1
输入您的具体学习目标和评估目标。我们的 AI 系统将分析您的需求,并建议与教育标准相一致的相关评估标准
自定义您的评分标准格式
Step 2
选择您首选的评估类型 - 无论是论文、演示、团队项目还是实验工作。调整评分标准以匹配您的年级和科目要求
生成并分发您的评分标准
Step 3
立即创建您的专业评分标准,如有需要可微调评估标准,并通过多种格式无缝地与您的教育社区分享
为什么教育工作者选择我们的 AI 驱动评分标准生成器?
体验人工智能在教育中的强大力量
智能评分标准创建
我们的人工智能驱动平台生成专业评估标准,确保评估的一致性和公平性
- 标准对齐的标准生成
- 智能评分权重分配
- 多维评估指标
可自定义评估
轻松定制和微调您的评分标准,以满足不同学科和课程的特定教育需求
- 灵活的标准调整
- 主题特定模板
- 学习成果对齐
全面分析
跟踪评估效果和学生表现,获取详细的分析和洞察
- 评估质量指标
- 学生表现跟踪
- 改进建议
受到500多所机构的5000多名教育工作者的信任
发现教师们是如何利用我们的评分标准创建工具来提高评估质量的

艾米莉·加西亚
高中文学评估专家
自动评分标准生成器彻底改变了我的评估过程。标准对齐评分标准的自动创建节省了数小时的准备时间,同时保持了高水平的学术标准

迈克尔·威尔逊
STEM教育协调员
该评估标准创建工具已经改变了我们部门的评估方法。详细的评分标准显著提高了学生对表现的理解和学术成果

Sarah Johnson
K-12 课程开发者
作为一名教育内容开发者,我发现这个评分标准生成器非常宝贵。它帮助创建与标准一致的评估工具,适用于不同年级和学科
评分标准生成器常见问题解答
专家解答关于创建和使用评估量规的常见问题
我们的综合评分标准生成器支持多种评估类型,包括学术论文、研究报告、口头报告、小组项目、STEM(科学、技术、工程和数学)作业以及创意作品集。每种评分标准类型都旨在与特定的教育标准和学习目标相一致